Our Methodology
Every WhatsTheMoat report follows a structured 9-phase fundamental analysis framework. Here is exactly how we analyze every stock.
Why This Order Matters
Most screeners show you PE ratios and dividend yields upfront. We deliberately start with the business model and competitive moat before looking at any financial numbers. Why? Because a number without context is noise. A PE of 50 is expensive for a mature bank but cheap for a high-growth SaaS company with 80% gross margins and operating leverage. Understanding the business first means every number tells a story, not just a data point.
Company Snapshot
Full business overview in plain English โ what the company does, who its customers are, market cap tier, sector classification, and key business segments with revenue contribution. This sets the context for everything that follows.
Business Model & Unit Economics
How does the company make money at the unit level? Per bed, per customer, per transaction โ we break down the revenue model, cost structure (fixed vs variable), operating leverage potential, and profitability drivers. We also identify the top 5 competitors with market share estimates and assess whether the industry is fragmented or concentrated.
Competitive Moat Analysis
Systematic evaluation of all five moat sources: intangible assets (brand, patents, licenses), switching costs, network effects, cost advantages, and efficient scale. Each is rated with specific evidence โ not generic claims. We assess whether the moat is widening, stable, or narrowing, and quantify it through ROCE vs industry average, pricing power trends, and customer retention rates.
Financial Analysis with Context
Numbers with narrative. For every metric โ ROE, ROCE, margins, growth rates, debt levels, cash flow โ we explain WHY it is what it is for this specific business. A low ROE might signal a capital-intensive growth phase, not poor management. A high PE might be justified by hidden operating leverage. We never say 'low ROE = avoid' without context.
Growth Runway
Where will future growth come from? We quantify each vector: market growth (industry CAGR), geographic expansion (white space remaining), product expansion, market share gains, margin expansion from operating leverage, and M&A. Then we calculate TAM, SAM, current penetration, and the remaining runway multiple.
Valuation Analysis
What is this business worth? We use multiple methods appropriate to the business model โ DCF with explicit assumptions for mature cash flows, revenue multiples for high growth, EV/EBITDA on normalized earnings for cyclicals. We present a fair value range (not a target price), compare to historical valuation bands, and state whether the current price implies undervaluation, fair value, or overvaluation.
Key Risks
Brutally honest risk assessment focused on company-specific risks: competitive threats, customer concentration, technology disruption, debt burden, management integrity, related party transactions, and valuation risks. Each risk is rated by probability and impact with specific trigger events to watch.
Investment Thesis
The synthesis. Four questions answered directly: What makes this business special? Why will it grow? What is the valuation opportunity (and why does the gap exist)? What could go wrong? We pre-answer the toughest questions Buffett and Munger would ask about this business.
Framework Score
A 1-5 star conviction rating synthesizing all 8 phases. Six sub-scores (0-10): Business Quality, Competitive Moat, Financial Health, Growth Runway, Valuation Attractiveness, and Risk Profile. Each with detailed reasoning citing specific evidence. This is NOT a buy/sell recommendation โ it is a structured assessment to inform your own decision.
What Makes This Different from Screeners
Stock screeners show you what the numbers are. WhatsTheMoat explains why they are what they are, and what they mean for this specific business.
A screener tells you ROE is 12%. Our framework explains whether that is because the company is in a capital-intensive growth phase investing for future returns, or because management is allocating capital poorly. The same number means completely different things depending on context.
We also assess qualitative factors that screeners cannot capture: moat strength and trajectory, management quality, competitive dynamics, and narrative mispricing โ cases where the market is telling the wrong story about a business.
See It in Action
Generate a free analysis on any stock and see the full 9-phase framework at work.
Try it yourself โ free